|
CHARLES C. RYRIE
by Paul P. Enns
Charles Caldwell Ryrie (b. 1925) is a graduate of Haverford College (B.A.),
Dallas Theological Seminary (Th.M., Th.D.) and the University of Edinburgh,
Scotland (Ph.D.). For many years he served as professor of systematic
theology and dean of doctoral studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, where
he challenged students to precision in theological speaking and writing. Dr.
Ryrie is especially gifted in his ability to clarify profound theological
truths in simple, precise language. He has enabled people to understand
biblical truth that they would otherwise not readily comprehend and in this
he has made an inestimable contribution to the Christian world.
Dr. Ryrie's writings have consistently been on the theological cutting edge,
addressing the critical issues of the day and speaking on behalf of
dispensational premillennialism. In his classic text, Dispensationalism
Today (1965), and his recent update, Dispensationalism (1995),
Ryrie clarifies many of the misunderstandings that opponents of
premillennialism and dispensationalism have leveled. He notes that even
Louis Berkhof, a covenant theologian, makes (dispensational) distinctions,
differentiating the OT from the NT and seeing four subdivisions in the OT.
Ryrie defines a dispensation as "a distinguishable economy in the
outworking of God's purpose" (Dispensationalism, 28). In a
dispensation God places people under a stewardship or responsibility, people
invariably failing the test, with a corresponding judgment and change.
Ryrie clearly delineates the sine qua non of dispensationalism:
1.
1. Dispensationalism keeps Israel and
the church distinct. This is the most basic test of dispensationalism.
2.
2.
The distinction between Israel and
the church is born out of a system of hermeneutics that is usually called
literal interpretation. Dispensationalism interprets words in their normal
or plain meaning; it does not spiritualize or allegorize the text. The
strength of dispensationalism is its consistently literal, or plain,
interpretation of Scripture.
3.
3. The underlying purpose of God in the
world is the glory of God (pp. 39-40). In contrast to covenant theology
(which sees salvation as the underlying purpose) and progressive
dispensationalism (which emphasizes a Christological center),
dispensationalism sees a broader purpose – the glory of God. (This theme is
developed in Transformed By His Glory) For this reason, the number of
dispensations is not the critical issue in dispensationalism – as long as
one is true to the three essentials of dispensationalism. Three
dispensations – law, grace, and kingdom – receive most of the treatment in
Scripture; however, it is possible to recognize other dispensations and
while the historic sevenfold scheme of dispensations is not inspired, they
seem to be distinguishable economies in God's program.
Dr. Ryrie also interacts with progressive (revisionist) dispensationalism as
held by Darrell Bock, Craig Blaising and Robert Saucy. This revisionist
dispensationalism represents a major departure from normative
dispensationalism. A major tenet of progressive dispensationalism is its
belief that the Abrahamic, Davidic, and new covenants are already
inaugurated and beginning to be fulfilled (already/not yet). They
understand Christ as already seated and reigning on the throne of David in
heaven. Ryrie questions, "Why is no mention made of an already inaugurated
Palestinian covenant (Deuteronomy 29-30)?" (p. 163). The revisionist
teaching of "already/not yet” is not new. C. H. Dodd taught it early in the
twentieth century; George Ladd, the covenant premillennialist, and
amillennialists A. Hoekema and R. C. Sproul have taught variations of it.
Even nondispensationalists recognize that progressive dispensationalism has
changed to covenant dispensationalism and has moved closer to covenant
theology. The revisionists' failure to make a clear and consistent
distinction between Israel and the church and the teaching that Christ is
currently reigning on the throne of David in heaven is assuredly closer to
covenant theology than to normative dispensationalism.
Originally a doctoral dissertation, The Basis of the Premillennial Faith
established the Old Testament foundation of premillennialism: "Holding
to a literal interpretation of the Scriptures, [premillennialists) believe
that the promises made to Abraham and David are unconditional and have had
or will have a literal fulfillment. In no sense have these promises made to
Israel been abrogated or fulfilled by the church, which is a distinct body
in this age having promises and a destiny different from Israel's" (p. 12).
With this foundation, Ryrie develops the Abrahamic covenant (Genesis
12:1-3), showing that this covenant awaits a literal, future fulfillment
with the establishment of Israel in the Promised Land. This can only be
properly understood when recognizing the distinction between Israel and the
church (cf. 1 Corinthians 10:32). The church does not receive the
fulfillment of these promises; they were made to Israel and will be
fulfilled to that nation.
Premillennialism is further established through the unconditional Davidic
covenant (2 Samuel 7:12-16), which promises: (1) a posterity; (2) David's
throne will be established forever; (3) David's kingdom will be established
forever (p. 77). Many OT passages confirm the future fulfillment of the
Davidic covenant (Psalm 89; Isaiah 9:6-7; Jeremiah 23:5-6; 30:8-9; 33:14-21;
Ezekiel 37:24-25; Daniel 7:13-14; Hosea 3:4-5; Amos 9:11). Christ did not
inaugurate this kingdom at His First Advent; it awaits His future return for
fulfillment (p. 93).
Premillennialism also has a basis in the new covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-34),
which provides unconditional grace, forgiveness, and restoration to the
favor and blessing of God. While an aspect of it applies to the church,
its complete fulfillment "requires the regathering of all Israel, their
spiritual rebirth, and the return of Christ” (p. 111). Ultimately, "the new
covenant is for Israel" (p. 124) and awaits fulfillment at Jesus' return.
While recognizing Ryrie's important contributions to many critical
theological issues, perhaps his most noteworthy contribution is the Ryrie
Study Bible, now in an expanded edition (1995).
|
|